Àá½Ã¸¸ ±â´Ù·Á ÁÖ¼¼¿ä. ·ÎµùÁßÀÔ´Ï´Ù.

Comparison of retention characteristics of Essix and Hawley retainers

Korean Journal of Orthodontics 2012³â 42±Ç 5È£ p.255 ~ 262
Demir Abdullah, Babacan Hasan, Nalcac©¥ Ruhi, Topcuoglu Tolga,
¼Ò¼Ó »ó¼¼Á¤º¸
 ( Demir Abdullah ) - Selcuk University Faculty of Dentistry Department of Orthodontics
 ( Babacan Hasan ) - Cumhuriyet University Faculty of Dentistry Department of Orthodontics
 ( Nalcac©¥ Ruhi ) - Suleyman Demirel University Faculty of Dentistry Department of Orthodontics
 ( Topcuoglu Tolga ) - Gaziantep University Faculty of Dentistry Department of Orthodontics

Abstract


Objective: We aimed to compare the retention characteristics of Essix and Hawley retainers.

Methods: Adolescents undergoing fixed appliance treatment at 2 centers were recruited for this study. Twenty-two patients (16 women and 6 men) wore Essix retainers (Essix group) while 20 (14 women and 6 men) wore Hawley retainers (Hawley group). The mean retention time was 1 year, and the mean follow-up recall time for both groups was 2 years. Two qualified dental examiners evaluated the blind patient data. Maxillary and mandibular dental casts and lateral cephalograms were analyzed at 4 stages: pretreatment (T1), post-treatment (T2), post-retention (T3), and follow-up (T4).

Results: The results revealed that Essix appliances were more efficient in retaining the anterior teeth in the mandible during a 1-year retention period. The irregularity index increased in both arches in both groups after a 2-year post-retention period. The mandibular arch lengths increased during treatment and tended to return to their original value after retention in both groups; however, these changes were statistically significant only in the Hawley group. Cephalometric variables did not show any significant differences.

Conclusions: The retention characteristics of both Essix and Hawley retainers are similar.

Å°¿öµå

Retention;Relapse;Orthodontic treatment

¿ø¹® ¹× ¸µÅ©¾Æ¿ô Á¤º¸

   

µîÀçÀú³Î Á¤º¸

SCI(E)
KCI
KoreaMed